If you are one of the few who has never been presented with evidence that Townhall plans to dismantle the family unit, then be glad that the task to educate yourself has just become easy. With this letter, I compile all of the necessary evidence into one easy-to-read document. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. Now, why all this fuss about a few lackadaisical endeavors? Simply put, it's because if Townhall thinks that it can make me have a conniption then it's barking up the wrong tree. Judging by the generally dangerous nature of Townhall's helpers, I can see that Townhall's primary goal is to suppress all news that portrays it in a bad light. All of its other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that not only does Townhall operate in the gray area between legitimate activity and irresponsible irrationalism, but it then commands its stooges, "Go, and do thou likewise."

There's an important difference between me and Townhall. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. Townhall, in contrast, is willing to kill for its -- or, if not to kill, at least to abet ethnic genocide, dictatorships, and predaceous televangelists.

For heaven's sake, Townhall has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for it. Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will create a system of ruffianism characterized by confidential files, closed courts, gag orders, and statutory immunity eventually. Townhall's minions actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these types of libidinous crackpots are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world within a short period of time. In reality, of course, one can usually be pretty sure when Townhall's lying. Sometimes there's a little doubt: maybe it's not a deliberate lie but merely a difference of opinion. But when Townhall claims that granting it complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air, there's no room for ambiguity: it's lying. Sorry for babbling so much, but the ability to artistically arrange words in an amusing manner does not qualify someone to be the leading social voice of a country.

Nothing more annoying than slow  drives who think going the speed limit on the left lane  and do not let faster drivers go by. The usual mentality is the "Im going the speed limit, you go around me". How selfish can a person be.

Next time someone comes up to you behind you and you are ont he fast lane, just move to the right. You go on your merry way, and the other person thats going faster goes on his way.

I hate that because a person is going faster someone thinks they need to be a self appointed cop and not let someone by.

The left lane is for going faster and passing, dont be a left lane HOG!

In my views, i have never been exposed to alot of conservatives. I've always been very liberal. But to me conservatives are a throw back to the 19th century. I find it funny that people around me that are conservatices have strange psychological problems that only comes out under pressure. They shun you for having relationships with women as one conservative worker did.

The people (conservatives) who denounce things such as sex, homosexuality, abortion are the ones who lust for them the most. Take for example Larry Craig, a in the closet Homosexual who denounces homosexuals but secretly practices fagotry. I find it ironic that this is the case.

Its the same thing when parents teach their kids. If they give them some room to think for themselves, they tend to grow up better. If they make alot of rules like conservatives to, the kid often breaks out of the rules because he feels caged in.

All conservatices I've met were narrow minded and insulting and ALL forced their belives on me. Im starting to be very bitter about this.

06/05/2008




Something that really annoys me, as i use bicycle trails to commute to work. They have installed 15mph speed limit signs in area trails. And cops are out there with radar detectors stopping bicyclists.

Okay, im totally against it. But i understand the reasoning, but their reasoning is misguided. The reason is that we have had a few bicycle to walker accidents. Bicycles are much faster than joggers. So if a bicycle is traverling at 25mph and the walker at 5mph, its going to hurt. But generally the trail has dividing lines, and bicycles behave alot line cars. Slow down when people are around, and pass on the left with a nice audible sign for the jogger.

But the problem is that walkers blame the bicyclists and not themselves. Most of the joggers are out there with ipods and totally unware of their sorroundings, they use most of the width of the trail to walk with their friends an just a pain to pass.

Some walkers even go a little bit ahead and put nails on the trail so bicyclists get flat tires.

The real problem is that d.c. does not want to fund bicycle trails which would be great to relieve some congestion in the area. We have limited amount of trails going into d.c. where most people work.

Get this, it takes me about 30 minutes by bicycle to commute to work. About 1 hour and a half by car. And the length by car is only 15 miles!!!!

We should be making good infostructure for bicycles, not putting up speed limit signs. Amsterdam, Paris, Aveiro etc.. have an excellent bicycle trail program. We should look at their systems so we can benefit.

Riding a bicycle improves us.

wassup